首页> 外文OA文献 >Exam success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools : is learning style or learning approach more important? : A critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry (“traditional”) and graduate-entry (“nontraditional”) medical students
【2h】

Exam success at undergraduate and graduate-entry medical schools : is learning style or learning approach more important? : A critical review exploring links between academic success, learning styles, and learning approaches among school-leaver entry (“traditional”) and graduate-entry (“nontraditional”) medical students

机译:本科和研究生入学医学院的考试成功:学习方式或学习方法更重要吗? :一项重要评论,探讨在校生入学(“传统”)和研究生入学(“非传统”)医学生之间的学术成功,学习方式和学习方法之间的联系

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Phenomenon: \udThe literature on learning styles over many years has been replete with debate and disagreement. Researchers have yet to elucidate exactly which underlying constructs are measured by the many learning styles questionnaires available. Some academics question whether learning styles exist at all. When it comes to establishing the value of learning styles for medical students, a further issue emerges. The demographics of medical students in the United Kingdom have changed in recent years, so past studies may not be applicable to students today. We wanted to answer a very simple, practical question: what can the literature on learning styles tell us that we can use to help today's medical students succeed academically at medical school? \ud\udApproach: \udWe conducted a literature review to synthesise the available evidence on how two different aspects of learning—the way in which students like to receive information in a learning environment (termed learning “styles”) and the motivations that drive their learning (termed learning “approaches”)—can impact on medical students' academic achievement. \ud\udFindings: \udOur review confirms that although learning “styles” do not correlate with exam performance, learning “approaches” do: those with “strategic” and “deep” approaches to learning (i.e., motivated to do well and motivated to learn deeply respectively) perform consistently better in medical school examinations. Changes in medical school entrant demographics in the past decade have not altered these correlations. Optimistically, our review reveals that students' learning approaches can change and more adaptive approaches may be learned. \ud\udInsights: \udFor educators wishing to help medical students succeed academically, current evidence demonstrates that helping students develop their own positive learning approach using “growth mind-set” is a more effective (and more feasible) than attempting to alter students' learning styles. This conclusion holds true for both “traditional” and graduate-entry medical students.
机译:现象:\ ud多年以来有关学习风格的文献充斥着争论和分歧。研究人员尚未确切阐明通过许多可用的学习方式调查表可以衡量哪些基础结构。一些学者质疑学习风格是否存在。当要为医学生树立学习风格的价值时,就会出现另一个问题。近年来,英国医学生的人口统计数据已发生变化,因此过去的研究可能不适用于当今的学生。我们想回答一个非常简单,实用的问题:关于学习方式的文献能告诉我们什么,我们可以用来帮助当今的医学院学生在医学院取得学术上的成功? \ ud \ ud方法:\ ud我们进行了文献综述,总结了有关学习的两个不同方面的现有证据,即学生喜欢在学习环境中接受信息的方式(称为学习“风格”)以及驱动他们学习的动机学习(称为学习“方法”)可能会影响医学生的学习成绩。 \ ud \ ud结果:\ ud我们的评论证实,尽管学习“风格”与考试成绩并不相关,但是学习“方法”却是:具有“战略”和“深层”学习方法的人(即,积极进取并有动力去学习)深入学习)在医学院的考试中始终表现得更好。在过去的十年中,医学院入学人口统计学的变化并未改变这些相关性。从乐观的角度来看,我们的评论显示学生的学习方法可以改变,并且可以学习更多的适应性方法。 \ ud \ ud见解:\ ud对于希望帮助医学生在学业上取得成功的教育工作者,当前证据表明,使用“成长思维方式”帮助学生发展自己的积极学习方法比尝试改变学生的学习方式更有效(且更可行)。学习方法。这个结论对于“传统”医学生和研究生入学医学生都适用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号